How do I install Verificate MCP?

Copy the http config for Cursor, Claude Desktop, Claude Code, or VS Code on this page. It uses the publisher's install, not a PlugMCP proxy.

Does Verificate MCP need an API key?

No required environment variable is listed on this record.

What transport does Verificate MCP use?

Verificate MCP is reached over HTTP.

When was Verificate MCP last checked?

Last checked 2026-10-20. Agentic code review, no signup to try: reality gates + frontier-model review, with veto.

Verificate MCP server

Verificate MCP — your vibe-coded MVP, all the way to production

You vibe-coded the demo. This ships it. Between a working demo and a launched product used to stand an experienced CTO and a senior dev team — the people who catch the mock refund path, the invented SDK call, the loop that dies at real traffic. Verificate MCP is that review team as an MCP server: 17 deterministic reality gates with veto power, fused with a frontier-model enterprise review (ISO/IEC 25010: performance, scalability, reliability), run on every AI-written change before it reaches your codebase. The AI writes; the gate holds the bar; you ship. Hosted, zero-install, binary verdict in seconds — in Claude Code, Cursor, Windsurf or any MCP client.

Not another linter wrapper. The code-quality shelf on every MCP directory is two things: scanners (ESLint, Semgrep and SonarQube bridges — deterministic rules, no judgment) and prompt relays that pipe your repo to your own LLM key (self-review with extra steps). Verificate is neither: the gates hold veto power that no model output can override.

Your coding assistant writes a mock and calls it done. It invents an SDK call that doesn't exist. It ships an N+1 loop that passes every test and dies under load. Verificate MCP runs the deep review pass on every AI output — deterministic reality gates first (any one can veto), then an enterprise-grade review scores what survives — before the code reaches your codebase.

A real rejection (verbatim)

12 plausible lines of AI-written payment code were sent through the production gateway. Verdict: REJECTED — score 30.8/100, vetoed by code_reality_gate, with findings including:

"N+1 synchronous API calls … For 100 items, this results in 100 sequential HTTP roundtrips, taking ~10–20 seconds and blocking the event loop/worker thread … will trigger Stripe rate limiting (100 req/sec limit)." "stripe.Inventory is not a valid Stripe SDK resource." "Floating-point representation issues lead to rounding errors in financial transactions; Stripe API requires integer cents."

Each of those is an afternoon of production debugging, caught in seconds.

Measured — vs. asking the model to review its own code

A frontier model asked "is this OK to merge?" in a natural workflow missed reward-gaming (a test that only does assert True) and a hallucinated API (stripe.Refund.create_partial) in 0 of 6 runs each. Verificate's gate caught both 6 of 6 — deterministically, with 0 false positives on clean code.

Adversarial case	LLM review alone	Verificate gate
Reward-gaming (`assert True` test)	0 / 6	6 / 6
Hallucinated API (nonexistent SDK call)	0 / 6	6 / 6

Battle-tested: 2,581 audited validations over 5 weeks (66 rejected, 270 flagged unfit), including guarding the write-path of a 21M-entity source-cited knowledge base (98.6% cited, 100% licensed across 268 sources). Reproduce it: scripts/ · full write-up: COMPARISON.md.

Tools

Each tool has one job — two gates that return verdicts, one advisor that doesn't, one generator:

Tool	Job	Returns
`validate_ai_output`	The merge gate for AI-written code. Deterministic reality gates (mock/placeholder veto, gaming & bypass detection, invented-API checks) run first and can't be overridden; ISO/IEC 25010 review scores what survives.	Binary approve/reject verdict + severity-ranked findings
`validate_plan`	The gate for plans and designs, before any code exists — completeness, feasibility, scalability implications, risk. The cheapest place to catch a bad design.	Binary approve/reject verdict + findings
`analyze_code`	Advisory deep-dive on existing code — hot paths, rate-limit math, failure modes, tech debt. Use it to understand a rejection or review inherited code.	Scores + findings, deliberately no verdict
`generate_code`	Generate + gate in one step — the LLM writes it, the same protection engine vets it before you see it.	Gated code (no placeholders, no invented APIs)

Beyond tools

The server also ships prompts and resources for a richer client experience:

Prompts gate_my_changes / review_my_plan — one-click workflows that loop validate → fix → re-validate until approved.
Resources verificate://gates (what each of the 17 deterministic gates watches for) and verificate://example-verdict (a verbatim production rejection).

Quick start — no signup, no token, 30 seconds

Every machine gets 25 free validations — no account, no card, no key. Add the URL and go:

Claude Code

claude mcp add --transport http verificate https://mcp.verificate.ai/mcp

Cursor / VS Code — one-click install:

LM Studio and Goose one-click buttons are at https://verificate.ai/mcp (GitHub strips their custom-protocol links).

Windsurf / any MCP client (JSON)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "verificate": {
      "url": "https://mcp.verificate.ai/mcp",
      "transport": "http"
    }
  }
}

Cursor: ~/.cursor/mcp.json. Windsurf: ~/.codeium/windsurf/mcp_config.json.

Then ask your assistant to "validate this function with verificate" — a structured verdict comes back in seconds, and every free-tier response shows how many validations you have left and what the gate has caught for you.

Keep going after the free 25

Sign up at https://verificate.ai/auth/signup (30-day trial, no card — then $30/mo) and add your token to the same config:

claude mcp add --transport http verificate \
  https://mcp.verificate.ai/mcp \
  --header "Authorization: Bearer YOUR_TRIAL_TOKEN"

or in the JSON config add "headers": { "Authorization": "Bearer YOUR_TRIAL_TOKEN" }.

Make gating the default

Tools an agent may call are tools it will skip under pressure. Add a standing rule (Claude Code: CLAUDE.md; Cursor: a rule file):

Before presenting any substantive code change as complete:
1. Call validate_ai_output on the change.
2. If the verdict is REJECTED, fix the findings and re-validate.
3. Never claim tests pass or systems are deployed without proof.

One-paste setup prompts that install these rules for you: PROMPTS.md. Or wire it into CI as a merge gate — see examples/.

How it decides

AI output ──► Reality gates (deterministic, any one vetoes)
              • mock/placeholder in the wire path
              • invented/hallucinated APIs
              • claimed-complete without proof
              • gaming & bypass detection
                       │ survivors only
                       ▼
              Enterprise review (ISO/IEC 25010 + MLOps)
              performance · scalability · reliability · tech debt
                       │
                       ▼
              Verdict: score /100 + severity-ranked findings
              (REJECTED = agent fixes findings and re-validates)

The two stages are deliberately separate: if reality and quality were blended into one score, a beautifully structured function that fakes its refund path could still average out to "acceptable." A veto architecture makes that impossible.

The category, honestly

Everything else on the MCP code-quality shelf is free — and that's fair, because a wrapper should be free. What you can't get for free is judgment with authority:

What you'll find on the directories	What it is	What it structurally can't do
Linter wrappers — ESLint MCP, Semgrep MCP, SonarQube MCP	Rule-based scanners exposed as MCP tools. Deterministic, free, worth running.	No judgment. Rules can't know the refund function never calls the payment provider, or that `stripe.Inventory` doesn't exist. No verdict, no veto — findings your agent is free to ignore.
BYO-key review relays	Your repo + a review prompt, piped to your own OpenAI/Anthropic key.	Self-review with extra steps: the reviewer shares the generator's blind spots, there are no deterministic gates underneath, and whatever the model says goes. You maintain keys, versions and hosting.
A bigger model	Hope the generator reviews itself better.	Self-review inherits self-blindness. An external gate holds the same bar for every model — which also makes smaller, cheaper models safe to ship with: same gate either way.
Human review of every AI diff	The gold standard, at human speed.	Doesn't scale at AI generation speed. The gate does the first pass in seconds; humans review verdicts, not raw diffs.
Verificate MCP	Deterministic reality gates with veto, then a frontier-model enterprise review — fused into one binary verdict. Hosted, always on the current model.	—

That second layer is the part you pay for: a frontier agent doing the deep review — production arithmetic, failure modes, SDK reality — with a deterministic floor under it that the agent itself cannot argue away.

Run locally (stdio bridge)

This repo is also a runnable, zero-dependency MCP server: a stdio bridge that serves initialize/tools/list locally and forwards tool calls to the hosted gateway. Use it with clients that prefer stdio servers:

VERIFICATE_TOKEN=<your-token> npx github:Verificate-Dev/verificate-mcp-quickstart

Or with Docker:

docker build -t verificate-mcp .
docker run -i -e VERIFICATE_TOKEN=<your-token> verificate-mcp

Without VERIFICATE_TOKEN, introspection still works and tool calls return instructions for getting a trial token.

FAQ

Does it slow the agent down? Each validation takes seconds, inside the loop, before work is presented. Compare with a defect found in CI or production plus the context switch to fix it — gating is net-faster for any change that matters.

Which languages? Validation is language-agnostic; analysis covers mainstream languages (Python, JS/TS, C++, SQL, Swift, …). Pass context.language for best results.

Can it block my agent? Yes — that's the point. A REJECTED verdict is designed to send the agent back to fix findings instead of presenting broken work. Your standing rule decides how hard the stop is.

What about false positives? Verdicts come with specific findings and the math, so they're auditable in seconds — you're never asked to trust a bare score.

Security & privacy

Requests are authenticated with your personal token; keys are single-user and rate-limited, with key-sharing detection.
Code is processed to produce the verdict and is not used to train models.
initialize/tools/list are public (so clients and directories can introspect); every tools/call requires your key.

Pricing

30-day free trial, then USD $30/month (launch offer: 50% off for 3 months). Volume and academic pricing: [email protected].

Guides

About

Built by Verificate Pty Ltd (Sydney, Australia) — an IBM Business Partner. Verificate builds sovereign AI infrastructure: the HELIX inference engine (calibrated confidence scores on every answer), the deterministic Decision Transformer, and this MCP validation server. Product page: https://verificate.ai/mcp · Official registry: ai.verificate/mcp

Licensing

This repo (the stdio bridge, client configs and CI examples) is MIT — use it freely. The Verificate validation engine and hosted gateway it talks to are a commercial service (30-day free trial, then subscription): the 17 protection gates and the frontier-model review run server-side and are not part of this repository.

Glama

🌐 Not an English speaker? Install instructions in हिन्दी · Português · Bahasa Indonesia · Español · 中文 · Tiếng Việt → INSTALL.md

Verificate MCP

Add this server

Host a copy with our keys and logs.

Server facts

Tools

Questions

How do I install Verificate MCP?

Does Verificate MCP need an API key?

What transport does Verificate MCP use?

When was Verificate MCP last checked?

Documentation

Verificate MCP — your vibe-coded MVP, all the way to production

A real rejection (verbatim)

Measured — vs. asking the model to review its own code

Tools

Beyond tools

Quick start — no signup, no token, 30 seconds

Keep going after the free 25

Make gating the default

How it decides

The category, honestly

Run locally (stdio bridge)

FAQ

Security & privacy

Pricing

Guides

About

Licensing

Glama